The Great Gatsby

Last night I did something I’d never done before…I wore a 20s dress.  Why? Because I had one, and I was going to The Great Gatsby.  More on that later…right now, let’s just focus on my amazing thrifted 20s silk velvet gown.

I don’t do the 20s for a several reasons… one being that it’s far too scarce and thus expensive.  The other being I simply do not find the cuts and styles flattering on me.  Even this dress, as elegant as it is, I don’t care for all that much.  I simply dislike the lack of shape that the 1920s produced.  However, even with that being said, I am by no means going to get rid of this beauty.

And now maybe the topic a lot of you have been waiting for…the film itself.  Director Baz Luhrmann has been under a lot of fire lately from the vintage community regarding the film.  People are up in arms over the costumes and the music.  Calling the costumes horrifically inaccurate and the music (which features artists such as Jay-Z and Jack White) disrespectful.  I don’t care, and nor should you.  Why?  Because it’s Baz Luhrmann.  Luhrmann has only five, count ‘em, five major motion pictures under his belt and they are all the same. And by that I mean they are all in the same vein of each other, which is a hyper-stylized depiction of the time and events taking place.  Luhrmann’s films are like paintings, works of art.  Each one shows his influence, his brush strokes, his style. They are flashy, garish, yet beautiful and completely over-the-top on nearly every level.  He produces pure escapism and entertainment with doses of historical bits and pieces (such as the Bohemian movement in Moulin Rouge! and the Stolen Generation in Australia).  The two films that he directed which took place in the time that they were filmed, Strictly Ballroom (1992) and Romeo + Juliet (1996), hardly reflect the time in an accurate manner.  They both suspend reality, and make the ordinary extraordinary!  It is because of Luhrmann’s resume that I am able to overlook the extreme exaggerations of the roaring twenties and the music.  And I feel that this is how every person going to go see this film should view it as well.

And I loved the film. I loved every second of it.  I love the insane headdresses, over the top dancing, huge champagne bottles and inflatable zebra pool floaties (need to get me some of them).  The cast was top notch too.  Leonardo DiCaprio is Gatsby.  He portrays the role with such kindness and emotion that you can’t help but feel for Gatsby and his pain and longing.  I can’t wait to see it again.

Outfit
Dress & Shoes: Thrifted
Brooch: Belonged to my grandmother
String of Pearls: Belonged to my mother
Bracelet & Earrings: Don’t remember…
“Headband” (Actually a choker, I know, I’m brilliant) & Dress Clip: Gifts
Pearl Clutch: Antique Alley, Portland

Vista Las Palmas

One of the fabulous things about our hotel is that they have complimentary bicycles for guests to use! We opted to go for a small peddle around one of Palm Spring’s modern neighborhoods, Vista Las Palmas, which also happens to be home to Elvis’ Honeymoon Hideaway!  Just like before, buckle up, this is yet another extremely picture heavy post!  This place has some of the most drool-worthy homes I’ve ever seen.

Sadly, I didn’t know you can tour Elvis’ home until we returned to the hotel.  Next time we’re in Palm Springs I’m totally going on a tour.

Continue reading

Rocket Roll

Last night is up there with one of the best nights of my life.  I got to see my favorite band, The Phenomenauts.  If you have not yet heard of them, I highly recommend you check them out.  They are, simply put, sci-fi infused rockabilly.  They sing songs about robots, planets, and space travel.  It’s awesome.  And while it may have been my fourth time seeing them, it was made better because I went in my own Phenomenauts uniform…which I call my Phenomenette outfit…

The band enjoyed it so much, they even took my picture for their Facebook page (*squee!*), and I also had my picture taken with the lead singer, and my favorite band member, Commander Angel Nova. *swoon!*

After three opening acts, including a local surf-rock band called Guantanamo Baywatch, the uniformed Phenomenauts took the stage for a stellar show that included crowd surfing and moshing by members of the band, crooning, and fire extinguishers.

Oh, my! Look at the time! I must get ready for the gingham party! Don’t worry, you’ll hear all about it!

The Black Dahlia: A Work of Surrealist Art?

WARNING: The Black Dahlia murder was gruesome and disturbing.  This entry goes into some detail about her murder.  To prevent any unwanted unpleasantness, I have included a link to an image for those interested in viewing a photograph of the crime scene.  I encourage a view, so to better understand the argument made in the book.

On January 15th, 1947 a mother and her daughter were walking near an area slated for more of the “tiny boxes” of post-war suburbia in Los Angeles and what they came upon was a sight like never before.  Laying in the grass was a nude woman’s body, severed at the waist, a breast cut away, several other gashes flecked her body, and her mouth had been slashed on either side.  Additionally, her body had been deliberately posed in a grotesque fashion instead of simply dumped.  Her name was Elizabeth Short and her eerie murder has been left unsolved.

In the book Exquisite Corpse: Surrealism and the Black Dahlia Murder, authors Mark Nelson and Sarah Hudson Bayliss argue that Short’s death was an act of art or that at least her murder was influenced by the surrealist movement.  Their argument is based upon the similarities between multiple pieces by various surrealist artists such as Man Ray, Salvador Dali, Max Ernst and Marcel Duchamp and the damage done and arrangement of Short’s body. To view an image of her body click here. A reminder, it is graphic.

Much of the surrealist art during the 1920s, 1930s and 1940s included images of nude women, some of which were bisected, like Short’s body, as well as images of odd doll and mannequin art that often did not include all body parts.  The book also discusses the imagery and story of the minotaur, frequently used by surrealists, and draws lines of comparison to how Short’s upper body was laid out.  The second half of the book goes into surrealist art that produced after Short’s murder, implying that many artists were aware and inspired by the murder, even implying that some artists may have known who the murderer was.  Exquisite Corpse makes a very compelling argument using a combination of many pieces art that were visible prior the the murder, and a web of connections placing many artists or friends of the artists in the Los Angeles area at the time of the murder.

Exquisite Corpse is not a book for someone who is a novice to the Dahlia murder.  General knowledge of the murder, as well as surrealist art, is preferred, if not necessary in order to understand the book.  So thank goodness for all those art history courses I took in college!

While Exquisite Corpse does not directly point the finger at a singular suspect, it does heavily lean toward one person who is also the most likely suspect.  That person is George Hodel, a doctor who had a possibly murdered his secretary just two years prior to the Dahlia murder, and later had sexual relations with his own daughter.  In 2003, Steven Hodel, George Hodel’s son, wrote the book The Black Dahlia Avenger (which I highly recommend) where he named his father as the killer.  Additionally, Hodel was close friends with artist Man Ray, and was active in the surrealist art scene.

In James Ellroy’s novel, The Black Dahlia, he also tackles the art angle, but points to a fictional perpetrator.  The book was unsuccessfully turned into a film in 2006, despite what should have been a stellar cast, including Hilary Swank, Aaron Eckhart and Scarlet Johansson.  I hated the film, due to its lack of believable characters and an unnecessary play up of a pornography angle.  However, if you would like to view the film, it is available for instant watch on Netflix.

Footsteps in the Fog

In about a week and a half, Patrick and I will be flying to San Francisco.  He will be attending a hackathon down in Palo Alto, while I stay in the heart of San Francisco to spend a weekend visiting many Hitchcock filming locations.  Recently I picked up this book, Footsteps in the Fog: Alfred Hitchcock’s San Francisco, which details the locations.

The book covers the filming locations of Hitchcock’s films that took place in the Bay area.  Including Santa Rosa for Shadow of a Doubt, San Francisco for Vertigo and The Birds, Bodega Bay for The Birds, along with various other northern California locations that were in several other films.  I have visited Bodega Bay before, including a visit to the infamous schoolhouse, as well as Mission San Juan Bautista, however I have never spent much time in San Francisco proper, mainly due to the fact my family lives in the LA area.

I plan for this book to by my guide as I spend the weekend in the city.  While I know that many locations have changed, if not been totally demolished over the years, I am still excited to walk in the footsteps of Hitchcock and Jimmy Stewart.  One such location that is no longer standing is the Portman Mansion, which was the McKittrick Hotel in Vertigo, which is such a shame.  As you can see the building was quite magnificent.

One thing I found interesting while reading the book is that Hitchcock took many geographic liberties with his films.  Portraying certain places to be closer than they were, many places in The Birds were not as close as they appear in the film, and also his choice to reconstruct certain locations on a sound stage rather than film at the actual location, such as the ballroom in the Fairmont Hotel in Vertigo.  I highly recommend this book if you’re a Hitchcock fan and either live in the Bay area or plan on visiting.

I hope to take lots of pictures.  And while I despise looking like a tourist, I know I’ll have to give in and ask for my picture to be taken by a complete stranger, since Patrick will be unavailable.  Oh well.  And may visit the Walt Disney Museum located right along the Presidio, but Hitchcock is my top priority!

I Strum My Guitar…

Last night I was finally able to check off a band that I’ve been dying to see for years off my list…Social Distortion.  Social D, like Brian Setzer and Big Bad Voodoo Daddy, was one of my early introductions into the neo-rockabilly movement, and for sometime, the three groups were all I would play intertwined with oldies.

The band’s performance, and Mike Ness’ (the man just turned 50!) was stellar, and right on par for what I had expected.  Ness entered the stage with donning a fantastic overcoat and stingy brim fedora.  Removing the coat revealed a black shirt, high waist pinstripe pants held up by white suspenders.  I wish the crowd would have taken note of how well dressed he was…but they were more concerned with the music.  Speaking of the crowd, it was the oddest mix of people.  You had those who were probably fans from the beginning, so they’re older, then you had some punk rockers, then you had the rockabilly crowd (which felt rather small actually) and then there was the group who simply felt as if they didn’t fit at all.  And I can also say this for the crowd, they were rough and mean.  The mosh pit crowd here was not as nice as that of ska shows (yes, yes I listen to ska).  I really wish Ness would do a solo tour.  I really like his solo albums, especially Under the Influences, more than Social D’s stuff, I must admit. Maybe one day…

This show was the band’s second in Portland.  Two nights previously they had performed an all ages show…maybe I would have been more comfortable at it…call me a wimp.  Although, Ness stated that our crowd was “better than the deadbeats from the last show”.  He also did a bit of praising of Portland, saying he’d rather stay here than go up to Seattle, and then yelled “Fuck, Seattle!” to a roar of cheers and applause.  Yeah, Seattle and Portland are pretty much constantly at war.

Want to see Social D? Check out their website to see if they are coming to a city near you!

Outfit
Air Force Issue Jacket: thrifted, patched & pined by me
Brian Setzer t-shirt: purchased at his Spirit Mountain Casino concert last December
Belt: Buffalo Exchange, Eugene
Skirt: Crappy Old Navy thing I thrifted in high school.  I call it my “concert” skirt, since it’s already been torn once, and I don’t care what happens to it.

Vintage Beauty: Introduction

Awhile ago, I picked up this book at Powell’s downtown…

The cover grabbed my attention right away, and flipping through its pages provided both quality tips, as well as a few giggles.  The book was written by Ern and Bud Westmore, of the famous Westmore film make-up artists.  Their father, George Westmore, founded the first film make-up department in Hollywood in 1917.  His sons worked with the likes of Rudolph Valentino, and went on to work on such classics as Gone with the Wind, the 1931 Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and Universal’s Creature of the Black Lagoon.  The family has a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame as well.

Beauty, Glamour, and Personality, written in 1947, reveals some of old Hollywood’s tips and tricks for creating that glamorous film star look.  Ern and Bud dedicated the book to their father, claiming it was he who was “the first to lay down the fundamental principles governing the application of make-up as a means of dramatizing the personality and enhancing a woman’s charm.”

I won’t be sharing each and every page with you, but a highlighted selection.  The first few pages include stories of how the brothers transformed everyday ladies into looking more glamorous and then there are a few pages that are simply far too outdated to be helpful.

Each entry will focus on something different…Face shapes, and their do’s and don’ts, including make-up and hair styles, eye make-up, “make-up for that nose”, lip make-up, skin tones, correct way of applying make-up, hands as a part of glamour, exercises, posture, and fashion tips.

Stay tuned!